go to the home page
gallery | pop | artdisc | contact | faq | sitemap
go to the main Gallery page
Home > Gallery > Digital Artwork > Rape the Environment, Part III

powered by FreeFind
         
 

Rape the Environment, Part III - click for closeup

Click to view full-size photo
(67k page)

   
Rape the Environment, Part III
2003 - Digital Media

March 2, 2003

Meet Harlan Ullman. Most Americans have never heard of this man, but he is, in fact, one of the more influential thinkers in the Bush Administration. A Pentagon planner and Senior Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies; formerly the Navy's "Lead of extended planning;" former professor at the National War College, whose students include Colin Powell. Ullman is one of the top minds among Bush's foreign policy, as well as the coming Gulf War II.

Listen to Ullman describe "Shock and Awe": "We want them to quit, not to fight, so that you have this simultaneous effect, rather like the nuclear weapons of Hiroshima, not taking days or weeks but minutes."

You may want to read that one again. The White House plan calls for hurling 800 cruise missiles on Baghdad during the first 48 hours of the war, more than all the missiles fired in the Gulf War; about one missile every four minutes on a city of five million. The rational is that by causing massive, immediate casualties, the will of the Iraqi army to fight will be lost, for fear of complete destruction.

Ullman continues, "There will not be a safe place in Baghdad. You're sitting in Baghdad and all of a sudden you're the general and 30 of you and division headquarters have been wiped out. You also have to take the city down. By that I mean you get rid of their power, water. In two, three, four, five days they are physically, emotionally, psychologically exhausted."

A modern-day version of Hiroshima. This is from the same Administration that claims to "liberate" the Iraqi people from the dictator they propped up. Just how many civilians will die in this campaign? The UN suggests casualties as high as 500,000 if Iraq's fragile infrastructure is destroyed; admittedly, this is a worst-case scenario, but the fact of high civilian casualties cannot be ignored.

Harlan Ullman also explained to the Financial Times why "information-age equivalents of the atomic bomb" need to be developed. "As the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki finally convinced the Japanese Emperor and High Command that even suicidal resistance was futile, these tools must be directed towards a similar outcome for terrorism and its place."

You may think that this policy was formed out of desperation, after the September 11 attacks. But, like much of the Bush Administration's policy, "Shock and Awe" was conceived years before 9/11. Ullman first described his policy in 1996, published by the Pentagon's National Defense University under the title "Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance."

Here's a passage: "The intent here is to impose a regime of shock and awe through delivery of instant, nearly incomprehensible levels of massive destruction directed at influencing society writ large, meaning its leadership and public, rather than targeting directly military or strategy objectives."

Sure makes you want to jump on board Bush's war. Nothing will make the people of the Middle East greet our soldiers with flowers and kisses than the sudden, violent deaths of tens of thousands of civilians.

It gets better. Donald Rumsfeld revealed more of the Administration's plans to the House Armed Services Committee on February 5. American forces are planning to use so-called "non lethal" biochemical weapons in Iraq, including anti-riot gases and crowd control agents, similar to the "non lethal" gases used by the Russian army to end a Chechen hostage crisis.

The only problem (not counting all those dead Russian civilians) for Rumsfeld is that such weapons are banned under the 1992 Chemical Weapons Convention and the 1928 Geneva Protocol. Unfortunately, the White House hasn't found an international treaty it couldn't scrap or ignore..

Finally, take a look at MOAB, or Massive Ordnance Air Burst. This bomb is a modern version of the Daisy Cutters used in Vietnam; a 21,000 pound weapon that is comparable to a small nuclear bomb. Of course, we are assured that this will only be used against military targets, not civilians. Civilians don't get hurt when 21,000-pound bombs are dropped on their cities.

But these things never matter when one is determined, even desperate to start a fight. Bomb the cities, rain fire on living beings, rape the environment.